[1983] 1 Ac 520, The Plaintiff, Junior Books,Had Entered Into A Contract With The Principal Contractor To Build A New Factory.veitchi, The Defendant, Entered.
Ltd., defenders in an action for damages by the respondents, junior books ltd., from a decision dated september 1, 1980, of the second division of the. This principle was applied similarly in junior books ltd v veitchi co ltd [1983] 1 ac 520. Junior books v veitchi [1983] 1 ac 520 by will chen key point:
[1956] Ewca Civ 4 )[1956] 1 Wlr 936.
Ltd 85 and loss of profits to the business while the replacement was to be carried out. Junior books ltd v veitchi co ltd (1983) pg.245 o veitchi negligently laid defective flooring in junior books factory, which meant they would have high ongoing maintenance costs. Junior books contracted with a business to lay a composite flooring in their.
Junior Books Limited (Respondents) V.
The house of lords held that there was sufficient proximity between junior books and veitchi to establish a duty of care and no reason to restrict that duty. Junior books ltd v veitchi co ltd anns. Junior books ltd v veitchi co ltd (bailii:
There Was No Allegation That The Defects In The Floor Made It Dangerous.
1 is an important decision of the house of lords. This appeal arises in an action in which junior books limited are thepursuers and the veitchi company limited are the defenders. Veitchi company limited 1983 1 ac 520 found that you could claim.
Upon Report From The Appellate Committee To.
Pure economic loss from defective property is recoverable where there is a sufficiently proximate relationship (now. Start a discussion about improving the junior books ltd. Write it here to share it with the entire community.